|
|
Post by Pete Hurrikane on Apr 19, 2012 13:25:27 GMT -5
The 'In to in' path involves an approach to impact from inside, then straight for 4/10 of a millisecond, and returning immediately to the inside after that. Giving, let's say a + or - 0.5° cushion, this would still be a difficult path to follow for the best of golfers. Adding to this, the factor of difficulty involved for hitting a straight shot from this path would require a square club face. For example, presuming we allowed a 0.5° cushion for both parameters could we identify why a ball is fading slightly using this shot choice. Is it because the path was + or was it the club face or was it both? Or or or.
I believe we can mechanise a robotic machine to cover this path proficiently but even with the above cushions in place these perfect parameters are almost impossible for golfers to achieve or repeat.
|
|
|
|
Post by stevem on Apr 24, 2012 10:32:24 GMT -5
Wrong, the golf swing no matter what goes in to in swing path. At the moment of impact it might be angled outward, but the clubhead will go back inward no matter what.
Also having more outward swing path will give leeway for hitting a draw, if its closer to square then you have no clue if its going to be left or right, it could be significant in that tolerance you specified. But, if you have an outward swing path, then you can draw it with hedging your right to left ball flight. You might hit it lets say 3 yard draw to 6 yard draw, but at least you know your going to draw the ball.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete Hurrikane on Apr 24, 2012 10:35:32 GMT -5
Wrong, the golf swing no matter what goes in to in swing path. At the moment of impact it might be angled outward, but the clubhead will go back inward no matter what. On that logic, lets rename all of the paths 'in to in' and discard the O and NBFL. Also having more outward swing path will give leeway for hitting a draw, if its closer to square then you have no clue if its going to be left or right, it could be significant in that tolerance you specified. But, if you have an outward swing path, then you can draw it with hedging your right to left ball flight. You might hit it lets say 3 yard draw to 6 yard draw, but at least you know your going to draw the ball. That's what I'm saying, a DTL path has parameters that require exactness which drift into unreliability. Except for robots. I have never intentionally hit a perfectly straight golf shot, putting aside. I shape every shot to a certain degree. Sometimes it comes off darn close to what I planned and other times to a lesser extent or even differently. |
|
